|
In the first part of this two-part article I'll cover the market changes and changing business needs that have made the career practice not only viable, but the most lucrative and flexible career approach for the senior executive. Then, in the next issue, I'll explain how a senior executive can successfully create a career practice out of available market opportunities.
A career practice is simply managing one's personal brand and professional opportunities as a strategy, without the standard reliance on a single income stream and the typical gaps with job transition efforts in-between different positions. A career practice substitutes simply going from role to role with an intentional market focus that includes multiple simultaneous roles and the bandwidth to continue to acquire future roles. A successful career practice ensures continuous activity and attractive revenue streams over the long term.
The Issue
Tenures have been continually shrinking for senior executives. Stability is no longer possible with standard full time roles. Many senior executives go from job to job more frequently, while finding less and less control in their career. For many the question is what’s next? How can I take the wealth of my 20+ years of experience and best leverage this in my career moving forward? How can I ensure significant and lasting financial wins for myself and my family?
The Market
For companies, trends in both hiring and outsourcing have caused dynamic shifts in the market. We see less retention and higher costs as tenures drop. Competitive needs are more dynamic, while having the right team now doesn't necessarily translate into being competitive in the next season. According to Execunet in 2008 the average tenure for an executive with Chief in his or her title was 3.2 years, with an even lower average in smaller companies. At the VP level in small to medium businesses (SMBs), retention is much shorter averaging just over 2 years across the C- level. Given these market trends, and the prevailing systems for hiring leadership, the move to hire has become much more costly for a company.
The Chinese symbol for crises is also the symbol for opportunity. We’ll look at the dynamic changes in the market for companies that are providing new opportunities for senior executives.
Let's say a CEO hires a new VP of sales to align the sales strategy, implement any systems, processes, and/or the right people, and then to drive the team forward to higher levels of revenue. Given a $140k base salary, with say an additional $40k in benefits and bonus potential, there’s typically an immediate unrecoverable recruiting cost to the company of $40 - $60k. Yet, it normally takes about 6 months before a CEO knows that they made the right choice.
Meanwhile, as many SMBs are experiencing, simply hiring a VP of sales may not address the complex issues the company is facing. SMBs often struggle with a broad range of issues related to revenue such as the high costs of sales, a misaligned or non-competitive go-to-market strategy, and leadership team limitations. Many smaller companies face core systemic issues that affect growth and costs. Often these issues trace ‘upstream’ to the leadership team and ownership. With these challenges, many SMBs have experienced a swinging door of hires with significant additional hard costs, not to mention opportunity costs. Given these combined trends, hiring leadership team members at the SMB level has become both costly and risky. Yet the CEO wouldn’t be hiring if they could simply take the work on. So it seems like a necessary gamble. Is there another option?
Interim Solution
Let’s apply the interim alternative: hiring an executive on a limited, contract basis. This option has proven very successful in lowering the cost of hiring by removing the recruiting and separation costs. It’s a method especially proven with the CFO function, and has gained prominence in the United Kingdom, and a fast-growing popularity in the United States as an alternative to hire. Secondary benefits of hiring an interim include gaining a try-before-you-by option which lessens the commitment for both companies and executives. With an interim, the hiring risk and upfront costs are significantly reduced. In the example, the CEO hiring an interim VP of Sales instead of a full time employee at the $140k level saves around $100k immediately by not having the recruiting, benefits, or separation costs.
Though the cost and risk saving advantages to this approach are significant for the CEO, a key limitation which I described earlier remains. Often within smaller companies, systemic issues usually relating to the leadership team and the CEO can prevent growth as much as having the right strategies, systems, processes and people. In short, the key issues which limit revenue growth for smaller companies are often not controllable by the interim or full time VP of Sales. Though the costs and risks go down, how can the interim VP of Sales make a sustainable impact on revenue for the company if the key issues are outside their control?
Comprehensive Engagement Solution
Now, picture this. Let’s say that rather than hiring an interim as an alternative to hiring a full time VP of Sales, the CEO decides to bring in a highly qualified senior executive to assess the company top to bottom and to implement needed strategies to increase revenue. The chosen senior executive understands the different elements of running a company, understands sales and increasing the top line at a deep and broad level, and knows the vertical industry of the company. He or she can work directly with the CEO on a peer basis while developing and implementing the sales strategy, among other related company needs. Systemic, up-stream issues can be confronted and dealt with. Essentially, the senior executive would take on a consultative role, peering up with the CEO, while providing hands-on implementation of a developed revenue strategy that the senior executive. The senior executive would have full control to implement as best suits the company, and therefore would have control over the results.
Given the level of this senior executive and the smaller size of the company, he or she can work on a strictly part time basis, one to three days per week for the length of the engagement. Upon successfully implementing the sales strategy, the senior executive can find their replacement to manage the new strategy going forward, while the senior executive exits the engagement and the company.
To summarize this approach, the CEO is given access to senior-level leadership experience and expertise that they likely couldn’t hire full time. The CEO gains this experience on a part-time and affordable basis, taking advantage of the same interim savings we talked about above. The CEO gains an objective and outside perspective as well as a respected partner in the growth and direction of his or her business and goals. Lastly, the CEO is left with a successful growth strategy, needed systems, and the right person to run it long term once the senior executive exits. If effectively structured and successfully implemented, this is clearly a major win for the CEO from a cost savings, risk savings, and value-add perspective. Going back to our main topic, how can this approach work for the senior executive?
The Opportunity
If you are a senior executive who understands the elements of running a business you can capitalize on the typical shortage of talent, systems, and effective leadership in small to medium companies as well as the high-risk, costly method for recruiting full time leadership.
Because of your experience you can engage with a SMB company on a limited, 1-3 days per week basis, while having a peer-level relationship to the CEO. Engaging part-time is the key to your opportunity at this level, because this allows you to take on multiple engagements. Just as importantly, you can reserve the bandwidth necessary to maintain the relationships in the market that lead to further engagements.
Taking on multiple, simultaneous engagements will allow you to create an attractive income for yourself, on par with or better than taking a full time role with a larger company. The ability to maintain your business development and brand-building efforts while delivering engagements gives you the control necessary to ensure on-going work, and thereby allowing you to recreate stability, growth and ‘equity’ in your career. The peer-level, comprehensively structured engagements you take on give you the flexibility to engage with full control of your role and results. Taken together, these advantages allow you to have a lucrative career practice and growing personal brand based on creating meaningful and self-sustaining changes to companies that could really use your help.
In the next issue I’ll delve into the different elements needed to make a career practice work.
|
A career practice is simply managing one's professional roles and opportunities as a strategy, included with a personal brand, and ever-growing brand equity, all without the standard reliance on one income stream and the typical gaps in between different roles.
Senior executives and businesses are finding ways to side-step the expensive and ever-riskier recruiting process by engaging on a less formal and shorter basis, normally with an agreed end date.
Taking objectivity a step further, the most successful interims create a peer relationship with the CEO, and act as both adviser and operational executive, working directly with the CEO.
|